Princess Diana, a favorite princess Waelskaya, tragically lost her life in a tragic car disaster in Paris on August 31, 1997. She was in a car with a guy Dodi Faed, their driver Henri Paul and her guard-rice rice. Jones, who suffered serious injuries, was lonely survived in a car accident. Later, the investigations showed that at the time of the catastrophe, none of the passengers was in the seat belts. Experts estimate that if they were drowning, their chances of survival would be about 80%. This makes you think about why Princess Diana and others were not in the seat belts at the time of the accident.
British security expert Michael Chandler, in a recent conversation with the Daily Mail, shed light on why the British royal family, including Prince William, Kate Middleton, does not carry seat belts.
Security Problems
According to Chandler, one of the main reasons why Royals do not always carry seat belts is safety. Protection staff must consider the speed at which they can get royal from the vehicle in case of emergency.
“As you can imagine, there is concern to extract the main vehicle as soon as possible,” Chandler said.
“Probably there is a risk-based approach,” he added. “There will be a risk assessment, the result of which will determine whether there should be additional precautions.”
Comfort
In addition to security, comfort and presentations, they also play a key role. Royals often attend loud activities that require them to wear military uniform or official clothing. Safety straps can spend clothes, which can affect the impeccable royal appearance that is necessary for public interactions and photos.
“If they are in the vehicle and leave the vehicle, Royals will be less prone to match the seat belt every time,” Chandler explained. “For example, with men, seat belts can fold, and it can also be a factor.”
Legal Liberations
While to wear a seat belt, the royal family is unlikely to face the legal consequences for what it doesn’t. For example, King Charles is insured against persecution from the old law dating from the 1689 bill.
For other Queen, law enforcement agencies seek to postpone security protocols. Chandler noted that security decisions made by security officers are unlikely to be disputed.
In addition, the release of the 1993 traffic law allows for emergency services, including diplomatic units that are part of the capital police to decide whether the use of the seat belt is necessary.
Do Royals wear if -any safety belt?
Despite the images of royalists who go without seat, Chandler said they actually carry them more often than people. “They really wear seat belts, probably much more than people,” he said. “In cases where they travel relatively fast on London or on the highways, they will definitely wear seat belts.”
