It is often said that we live in a strange world where life seems unfamiliar than fiction- and it’s right. The new bizarre news development is that Google now pays its leading equipment to do absolutely nothing.
According to a recent Business Insider report, Google now puts some specific staff – mostly from it AI Deepmind Division – on paid leaves. Yes, you read it correctly! The idea is that this will prevent them from joining Google competitors.
A gold cell in real life
These employees are recorded in contracts that prevent them from working elsewhere for several months – even up to a year. This is called the “non -competitive agreement” and it is used as a strategic step to block competitive companies from accessing AI talents.
In some cases, employees are located on what is called “garden -rest”, especially in the UK. They are still on salary, but they are forbidden to contribute to any project – even on Google. During this time, their only job is just sitting and not working for anyone.
Causing this, Microsoft AI VP (and former Deep mass The director) Nand de Freitas posted on social media: “Do not sign these contracts. No American corporation should have so much power, especially in Europe. This is the abuse of power.”
Why Google does it
It all comes down to staying forward in the AI Innovations race. With CHATPT OPENAI and your own Google Twins Models that push the boundaries of what is possible every day is considered. And in such a competitive setting, lagging- even for a few months- it may mean loss of market share, innovation or even relevance.
Thus, Google hests its rates. Keeping talents, they made sure no one else could use this brain power to get forward. It is less about what these employees do now, and more about what competitors will not be able to do.
“It really feels like a space race. Being six months ahead, it can change everything,” said a former Deepmind researcher.
Is it justified?
But not all employees are all right when they are lagging behind. Some say it hurts their careers.
The reaction is particularly strong in Europe, where non -competitive provisions are under legal control. Critics claim that these agreements implement innovations, restrict career growth and create toxic content over the brightest minds of the industry.
However, Google justified its step, calling it fair. “Our work contracts meet the market standards. Given the tangible nature of our work, we use incompetence selectively to protect our legitimate interests,” the company said.
What are your views on a strange Google strategy to stay in the AI race? Do you think it’s right? What would you do if you don’t pay you anything, if you would not take it or give up your suggestion? Tell us about your views in the comments section below.
